Castle Branch - Employment Screening & Background Checks Make Safe & Informed Decisions
888.723.4263 		 
Contact Us Online Services   Log In
Services
Enter ePass to view Background check

 
 
Castle Branch, Inc.
Phone: 888.723.4263
Fax: 910.815.3881

Castle Branch Drug Testing

Castle Branch complements its employment screening programs with nationwide drug testing services. The need for drug testing cannot be understated: in the United States over 20 percent of full-time employees between the ages of 20 and 34 used illicit drugs last year, missing work almost twice as often as non-drug users, and filing more than twice as many workers compensation claims.


Castle Branch brings years of experience to employers requiring substance abuse screening services, along with an uncompromising commitment to customer service. Numerous collection sites are located in most cities. A medical review officer is available to interpret positive results and an account manager is always available to review current drug testing policies.


Castle Branch drug testing reports are provided in an easy-to-read format and are delivered via fax, e-mail, or over the Internet through our web-based information management system. Whether improving a current drug testing program or implementing a new program, a Castle Branch account manager is always available as a guide throughout the process. Castle Branch offers two categories of drug testing: laboratory testing and on-site testing kits.


Order Drug Screening


Contact a Sales Representative



©2008 Castle Branch, Inc.
Castle Branch

Margaret ran a non-profit girls and boys club. She performed a statewide criminal record investigation on all employees and thought she was safe when she hired Lee as a janitor. Months later, she received an anonymous letter notifying her that Lee had been convicted of child molestation. The letter included a copy of Lee's record from another state's sexual offender index. Margaret had missed the criminal conviction since it occurred in a state where Lee had previously lived and where a statewide search was unavailable. Lee had worked in the girls and boys club for the past six months and had numerous opportunities to be alone with the children. Margaret owed it to the children and her staff to terminate Lee's employment and to add sexual offender index searches to her employment screening program.


  
Disclaimer